Case Study – Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

Task

This assessment task requires you to write a 1600–1800-word report analysing a data ethics case study.

You are required to choose a real-life data ethics case identified recently in the news media (the case must have been reported in the news media within the past twelve months.

Use moral imagination to identify the ethical dilemma presented in the case. An ethical dilemma is a problem involving an ethical issue that requires resolution, where no one choice is acceptable to all parties. These are complicated challenges that cannot be easily solved. We have discussed ethical dilemmas in weeks 2 and 3 such as the use of predictive policing and employee surveillance. Please select a different dilemma for this assessment.

Apply the ethical frameworks (covered in the course), to bring a comprehensive, multi- perspective lens to the ethical dilemma.

Instructions

Introduction: (~400 words)

A brief description of the ethical dilemma including the specific context and the issue chosen.

Who are the key decision-makers? Who are the stakeholders?

What are the facts pertaining to this issue?

Why do you consider this to be an ethical dilemma? What are the assumptions and biases here?

Analysis: (~850 words)

Consider this issue using the range of ethical frameworks covered in class. You can use the ethical decision-making questions provided in the Assessment Guidelines to help you. Use appendices – for example tables, to provide evidence of the application of several ethical frameworks (consequentialism, deontology, justice, care and virtue). Then write up a comprehensive analysis using a multi-perspective lens to the ethical dilemma

Note: The purpose of appendices is to provide content that can support your analysis. Using appendices will allow you to demonstrate that you have applied a range of ethical decision- making frameworks and have written up your comprehensive analysis based on this application.

Words in appendices are excluded from the word count. Appendices should be no more than 3 pages.

Decision and justification: (~350 words)

What would be the ‘right’ (most justifiable) course of action in these circumstances?

Why?

Please note that the overall word count of this assessment does not include the reference list or the appendices.

The following criteria will be used to assess your submission:

Clear and concise description, appropriateness of chosen dilemma, clear focus on relevant details.

Ǫuality of analysis, depth of reflection, and evidence of how the ethical thinking tools are applied to the factual details of your chosen dilemma.

Clear articulation of how the decision and justification of what would be the ' right’ course of action in these circumstances. Consistent, clear and well-supported arguments.

Structure, written expression, clarity, Harvard referencing style.