NRSG378: Extended Clinical Reasoning - Assessment 3 Semester 1
Nursing
4th Jun 2025
2
NRSG378: Extended Clinical Reasoning
2025 Semester 1
Assessment Information:
Assessment Title: Assessment Task 3 – Case Study
Weighting: 50%
Length: 2000 words (+/- 10%; includes intext citations, excludes reference list)
Purpose
This assessment enables requiring extended students to apply knowledge from unit learnings to an issue clinical reasoning. The assessment will engage students with the application of theory to practice, and is designed to facilitate an understanding of the impact of illness on the patient. It is also intended to give students the opportunity to demonstrate the ability to use a clinical reasoning framework to plan the care of an acutely unwell patient
Appendix Rubric
Appendix of the NRSG378 Assessment information. Also located on Canvas with the assessment information
Canvas Resource
A National Q&A Session will be held during week nine (9) of the semester. The Q&A session will unpack the assessment task requirements. Students will have the opportunity to ask the National LICs any questions or clarifications they require. All students are recommended to attend this session. A recording of the National Q&A session will be made available for students. The link will be made available on the Assessments page of the Canvas unit.
Learning Outcomes Assessed: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5
Task: Enables students to apply knowledge from unit learnings to an issue requiring extended clinical reasoning.
Assignment Overview
Task: 1
Case Study
Using the case study provided use a clinical reasoning approach to demonstrate high-quality, evidence-informed nursing care for an acutely unwell patient
Using Evidence-Based Research
Provide evidence-based responses to all questions. Use at least 15 evidence-based references, such as peer-reviewed journal articles, systematic reviews, or research studies published within the last seven years.
You may also include guidelines or policies (e.g., national standards) to support your answers, but do not over-rely on these as primary sources (i.e. use them and other sources concurrently: See APA Guide: Multiple Sources)
Reference Formatting
Use APA 7th edition formatting for in-text citations and the reference list. For guidance, refer to the ACU Library APA Citation Guide and the APA Citation Guidelines
Assignment Questions
Presenting medical concern, pathophysiology and further nursing assessments (600 words):
Part 1A
Based on the limited clinical information currently available, identify one significant presenting concern or potential issue Lily may be experiencing. Discuss the observed evidence (e.g., presenting signs and symptoms) that supports your impression, and identify (no need to explain) any gaps or uncertainties where further assessments are required to clarify Lily’s condition and guide care planning.
Part 1B
Using your initial impression of Lily’s presenting concern (Part 1A), discuss the potential underlying pathophysiological processes that could explain the observed signs and symptoms you identified and explain how these processes may contribute to Lily’s clinical presentation.
Part 1C
Identify and explain which additional assessments are required to provide further clarity regarding Lilly’s clinical presentation and condition. Present these in a list format, and for each item, include a brief rationale explaining its importance or purpose. If recommending repeated assessments, justify why ongoing monitoring is required.
Disease Pathophysiology and Complications (600 words):
Based on Lily’s medical and surgical history and presenting condition, she is at risk of acute deterioration. Lily may be at risk of the following complications
Septic shock
Respiratory failure or Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Right-sided heart failure
Fluid overload
For this question, select two (2) complications from above and address the following questions: For each selected complication:
Explain why Lily is at risk for developing this complication, using specific details from her clinical presentation and patient assessment findings and relevant medical history.
Discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to the complication, focusing on key processes that increase her risk. Use evidence-based references and data (signs and symptoms) from the case study to support your response.
Identify Nursing Issues (400 words)
Using the nursing problem/issue format, identify and prioritise three (3) high-priority nursing problems/issues to address during the patient’s current admission.
Part 3A
Identify three nursing problems that are critical to the patient’s immediate care and safety.
Given the acute nature of this presentation, focus on urgent clinical needs rather than lower-priority issues such as ADLs. Your response must include:
A minimum of two actual problems are required; one potential at-risk problem may be identified, but you must justify why it is a priority concern.
For each nursing problem, use the nursing problem/issue format:
Problem (P): State the issue using appropriate terminology (e.g., "Ineffective airway clearance" or "Risk for aspiration").
Aetiology (A): Identify the related cause or contributing factors (e.g., "related to excessive secretions" or "related to impaired swallowing").
Symptoms (S): Provide evidence or defining characteristics (e.g., "as evidenced by laboured breathing and oxygen saturation of 88%").
Part 3B
Justify why this nursing problem is a high priority:
Explain how this issue impacts the patient’s immediate safety, health, or recovery. Use patient assessment findings, clinical reasoning, and evidence-based sources to support your response.
Nursing Care Strategies (400 words):
Identify, rationalise, and explain, in order of priority, the nursing care strategies you would. Implement or advocate for this patient within the first 24 hours of her admission. These strategies should address the patient’s most urgent needs, as identified in your prioritised nursing diagnoses (Question 3).
For each strategy:
Describe the nursing care strategy: Clearly state the intervention or action you would take.
Rationalise the strategy: Explain why this action is a priority, referring to the patient’s clinical presentation, assessment findings, and identified nursing problems.
Explain how the strategy will address the patient’s needs: Provide evidence-based reasoning that connects the intervention to expected outcomes and supports the patient’s immediate safety, health, or recovery.
Ensure your response focuses on high-priority strategies related to the acute emergency presentation and excludes lower-priority actions such as ADLs unless directly relevant to the patient’s safety
Formatting |
|
File Format |
.doc or .docx (Do not submit .pdf files or pages files) ACU has made Microsoft Office 365 available for students for either PC or Mac versions. |
Margins |
2.54cm, all sides |
Font and Size |
11-point Calibri or Arial |
Spacing |
1.5 spacing including the reference list |
Paragraph |
Aligned to left margin, indent first line of each paragraph 1.27cm |
Title Page |
Not to be used |
Headings |
Not required |
Structure |
Introduction, main paragraphs, conclusion, reference list |
Direct Quotes |
Always require page number. No more than 10% of word count in direct quotes |
Header |
Page number top right corner (9-point Calibri or Arial) |
Footer |
Name - Student Number – Ax2 – NRG378 - 2025 (in 9 points Calibri or Arial) |
WBC |
13.2 x 10⁹/L |
Referencing |
|
Referencing Style |
APA 7th Please refer to the APA7 resources on the APA7 website. These are free resources to assist with intext citations and referencing. https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/handouts-guides |
Referencing and Supporting Evidence |
A minimum of 15 evidence-based quality and contemporary resources are to be used. Nursing related literature (including textbooks) should be cited in preference to medical focused literature. |
Age of References |
Published in the last 7 years as this area of knowledge is rapidly developing |
List Heading |
“References” is centred, bold, on a new page (in 14-point Calibri or Arial) |
Alphabetical Order |
References are arranged alphabetically by author family name |
Hanging Indent |
Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent |